All playbooks

Brand Strategy

Brand positioning statement

Fill the classic positioning formula against your real competitors. Naise returns three refined variations and flags any claim a rival could make word for word.

Watch the session
Competitor Analysis DocBrand Voice Doc

The brief Naise works from

From the competitor analysis document in this project (or, if none is attached, treat the competitive set as: who you are up against) build our positioning statement using this frame: for target audience, brand name is the category that delivers key benefit, because only brand name is why only you. Return 3 refined variations. Then stress-test each one: name any rival who could sign the same sentence unchanged, and rewrite the weakest claim so they could not.

Highlighted words are the blanks you fill in. Leave one empty and Naise uses a sensible default.

Positioning

Lumira positioning statement, 3 tested variations

Three versions of the classic frame, one eliminated because a competitor could sign it word for word.

3 variations1 eliminated1 axis left unaddressed
See the full output in the session

Inputs it asks for

target audience

For example: lapsed routine-starters, 25 to 40

brand name

For example: Lumira

category

For example: skincare brand

key benefit

For example: a routine you can actually keep

why only you

For example: built around refills, so the cost drops after month one

who you are up against

For example: clinical brands on trust, pharmacy own-label on price

Worth knowing

A positioning statement is internal. It settles arguments about what to build and what to say. It is not a tagline.

More brand strategy playbooks

See all