All playbooks

Brand Strategy

Competitor brand audit

Name the competitor and Naise reads their public presence for archetype, audience and the emotional blind spot their messaging keeps stepping around.

Watch the session
Competitor Analysis DocWeb Research

The brief Naise works from

From the competitor analysis document in this project (or, if none is attached, work from their public presence alone: what you know about them) audit the brand of competitor name. Their site is their website and their line is 'their tagline'. Read their public messaging and deduce: their probable brand archetype and the evidence for it, who they are really speaking to as opposed to who they claim, the three words they lean on hardest, and one emotional blind spot their messaging consistently avoids. Finish with the single sentence we could say that they structurally cannot.

Highlighted words are the blanks you fill in. Leave one empty and Naise uses a sensible default.

Brand audit

Competitor brand audit, clinical incumbent

Archetype with the evidence behind it, their real audience, and the sentence their position forbids.

14 pages read0 acknowledgements of unsuitability1 unsayable sentence
See the full output in the session

Inputs it asks for

competitor name

For example: Brand X

their website

For example: brandx.com

their tagline

For example: Science-led skincare for every skin type

what you know about them

For example: clinical positioning, dermatologist-fronted, premium price

Worth knowing

This reads a rival's public brand: archetype, real audience, and the feeling their messaging avoids. For a counter-positioning play with content attached, use the competitor gap play.

More brand strategy playbooks

See all